Zircon fission track dating humphreys high school dating games online
Biblical creationists have long realized that the millions and billions of years resulting from radiometric dating was one of our major challenges.
Similar to Larry Vardiman in his introduction to the RATE project at the 5 November conference, I saw that radiometric dating is the basis for upholding the hypotheses of evolution and the supposed old age of the earth.
While FTM detrital-zircon data are ideally used to provide low-temperature information, U–Pb single detrital grain ages record the time of zircon formation in igneous or high grade metamorphic environments.
This methodology may be used to study the possible sources of the basins sediments.
He argued that overall peer review is needed and quite beneficial to the creationist movement, but there are shortcomings, as most all creationist and secular scientists realize.
There are many assumptions behind radiometric dating, but there are three main ones.
The RATE group has discovered that one or more periods of accelerated radiometric decay occurred in the past.
Thermoluminescence is produced by radioactive decay particles (electrons), trapped in mineral grains.
Uniformitarian scientists assume (1) the initial isotope amounts are known, (2) the decay rate has remained constant at today’s rate, and (3) the sample has remained in a closed system for millions and billions of years.
Evidence is presented that all three assumptions are violated in various contexts, but the RATE project concludes that the assumption of constant decay at today’s rates is the most significant wrong assumption.
My study certainly was not a waste of time, since the earth sciences are filled with the results of dating methods, which guide many uniformitarian ideas in the earth sciences.
Besides, it helps me review the results of the RATE project.